Armstrong tells Jackass star he "saved his family’s quality of life" by investing in well-known company
Cycling
Follow IDL Pro Cycling on Google
Stay up to date with the best cycling news by making us a preferred source on Google.
Follow us on GoogleThe cycling world crushed Lance Armstrong after his career, but he has now found his place again differently - as someone who shares his opinion with his THEMOVE podcast. In addition, he regularly joins other well-known people in the United States, as he did now with Jackass member Steve-O. He discussed specific topics with Steve-O, an inexperienced man in professional cycling.
ADVERTISEMENT
Steve-O introduced Armstrong - who has seen all the Jackass movies - as 'the most famous cyclist' of all time, but also asked him some difficult questions. One question concerned the claim Armstrong received from US Postal, the team he won the Tour de France six times. "They wanted 100 million dollars from me. Which I didn't have," the American laughed.
"It was either 107 or 111 million dollars. That included expensive lawyers, signed endorsements, and things like that," he explains. "It was a lot. They convinced me there was a five percent chance that I would indeed have to pay, even though I assumed that the percentage was zero. After five years, we finally settled." The settlement amount was said to be around 5 million dollars.
And that ultimately had consequences, although Armstrong luckily came out on top with a good investment. "I lived in uncertainty for a while but invested early in Uber. When the company had just started, that saved my family's quality of life, so to speak. That investment was fucking magic," he says without hesitation. "I am no longer a shareholder, but it is now worth 70 billion dollars. We invested when it was worth 3.5 million dollars. You can do the math. To put it in context."
It is unknown exactly how much the former cyclist invested in the American company at the time, which he did through a Chris Sacca investment fund. "He did a great job helping me with this investment."
Read more below the photo!

Armstrong speaks out in favor of doping measures
The stuntman also asked Armstrong, "What the hell is wrong with doping?" to which the Texan could not help but smile. "I understand your question, but you must have some guard rails in place. I am not a fan of these agencies that enforce things primarily because I think they are ineffective. They spend a lot of money, and they are just not that effective, but that does not mean we should say that everyone can do what they want. I don't think you should do that."
"We should not let athletes do as they please. Then they take enormous risks," Armstrong says. "Exactly how dangerous is doping? Steve-O, this is a non-starter. And I'll tell you why. The IOC monitors everything; all sports are part of that because they are part of the Olympic movement. And that's a good thing," the American concludes.
Video: Armstrong sits down with Jackass member Steve-O
Read also
IDL-productions

Celia Gery won the European cyclocross championship while awaiting surgery: 'It'll be a new beginning'

Dutch team coach De Knegt annoyed by European Cyclocross Championships dispute: "A bit of a let down"

Glasgow set to shine as World Cup demand outstrips expectations and Mason eyes first home cyclocross race

Pogačar, Vingegaard and Van Aert went faster again in 2026... except when they didn't

Team GB dominate, China on the rise, Lavreysen the best ever? Five takeaways from the 2026 Track World Championships
Latest Cycling News

Superprestige Niel 2026 start list | No Schreiber, Alvarado, or Nys, but Brand, Vanthourenhout, and Nieuwenhuis line up

Ceylin del Carmen Alvarado's injury isn't as bad as feared, but she may not line up for a while

Fears of serious injury to Alvarado, bronze medalist, after the European Cyclocross Championships

Schreiber slams disrespectful European cyclocross championship judges: 'They didn’t even let me finish speaking'

Sir Chris Hoy gives an update about living with stage four cancer: 'I'm doing pretty well really'
Popular Cycling News

Sven Nys spoke with Lucinda Brand straight after European Championship drama: 'Is that enough to ultimately relegate someone'

Fears of serious injury to Alvarado, bronze medalist, after the European Cyclocross Championships

Disqualified Schreiber skips European Championship podium: 'I’m very grateful that she said that'

2026 European Cyclocross Championships Results | France and Belgium dominate in the Dutch mud

Tadej Pogačar reveals his insane training data in new HBO film: 'I think that's what works best'
Latest Comments
- Eight riders told to go for stages, and nobody gets one—hard to know what the plan was there. It’ll be interesting to see whether they pick a clear leader next time.bikebuffj10-11-2026
- Was Bernal’s 20th place really their best GC result? I thought he might have finished higher. Either way, it sounds like a rough Tour for the whole team.gearguru3310-11-2026
- Five days in breaks with no stage win is a painful stat. The team had chances, but they need to turn those opportunities into results.julien10-11-2026
- The Onley Vuelta example makes sense: a team with someone to rally around often looks much more cohesive. Hopefully INEOS can build on that rather than expecting a quick return to the Sky years.cadencekingm10-11-2026
- Thomas is right about the ambiguity. Eight riders all chasing stages can end up pulling in different directions, even if nobody’s deliberately working against anyone. They need a clearer plan once the GC leaders are out.robert6510-11-2026
- What a mess. The report makes it sound as though nobody properly explained the decision, and that’s hard to defend.jennifer1910-11-2026
- I’m still learning the rules: does moving left in a sprint automatically bring a penalty, or does it depend on whether the other rider is blocked? It sounds like Brand wasn’t impeded here.patriciaw10-11-2026
- A final decision still needs a proper explanation. If the federation’s complaint goes nowhere, I hope the officials at least review how they handled the riders afterwards.michael5410-11-2026
- Fair play to Lucinda for saying Marie had won fair and square. That kind of sportsmanship matters, especially after such a controversial decision.raceready710-11-2026
- Schreiber beat Brand on the road, so the jury needed to explain clearly why that slight deviation warranted relegation. Being cut off before she could give her account sounds appalling.lindae10-11-2026


