"Lappartient maintains close ties with dictators": Bruyneel won’t let UCI controversy rest after Tour appearance
Cycling
Follow IDL Pro Cycling on Google
Stay up to date with the best cycling news by making us a preferred source on Google.
Follow us on GoogleAll of a sudden, Johan Bruyneel was back in the Tour de France. On Thursday, July 17, the Belgian returned to the Tour de France for the first time in 14 years. This was much to the displeasure of the UCI, as the cycling union launched an investigation into the events. Initially, this sparked a cynical response from Bruyneel, who later added fuel to the fire.
ADVERTISEMENT
“The Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) noted the presence of Mr Johan Bruyneel in the Tour de France start village on July 17, 2025 in connection with his participation in Vive le vélo, a programme broadcast by the Flemish-language Belgian public television channel VRT1,” the cycling union announced in an official press release. “On October 25 2018, Mr Bruyneel was sanctioned by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) with a life ban for anti-doping rules violations when he worked with the US Postal Service Pro Cycling Team and the Discovery Channel Pro Cycling Team.”
“In accordance with Article 10.14 of the World Anti-Doping Code and the UCI Anti-Doping Rules, Mr Bruyneel is banned for life from taking part in any activity related to cycling,” the statement continued. “Mr Bruyneel was therefore not authorised to be present in the Tour de France start village or team area, but the UCI adds that it is not responsible for the accreditation process for the Tour de France. The UCI confirms that it has contacted the ASO to ask for clarification.'
Bruyneel responded cynically. “It seems that the president of the UCI, David ‘The Selfie King’ Lappartient, didn't like me visiting the Tour de France last week. I have said many times, including to him personally, that I find his attitude hypocritical. I sent him a personal message after the press release and he has not yet responded. I am waiting for your reply on WhatsApp.”
Read more below the photo!

Bruyneel adds: "UCI decision not only hypocritical, but politically motivated"
That response did not seem likely to come, so Bruyneel decided on Tuesday to add fuel to the fire via X. In a lengthy statement, the Belgian expresses his disappointment. "It is disappointing to see the President of the Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI), Mr. David Lappartient, publicly and heavily object to my presence at the start of a stage at the recent Tour de France - where I participated solely in a media capacity - while at the same time maintaining close ties with political leaders (dictators) whose records on human rights are deeply troubling."
"Mr. Lappartient has appeared publicly alongside President Paul Kagame of Rwanda and former President Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedow of Turkmenistan, two heads of state widely criticized by international human rights organizations for systemic violations of fundamental freedoms. Despite this, both have been welcomed by the UCI, decorated with awards, and actively involved in high-profile partnerships within the cycling world."
"This inconsistency raises serious questions about the standards the UCI and Lappartient applies - and to whom. If the UCI leadership is comfortable honoring authoritarian regimes with well-documented human rights abuses, then singling out my presence at a sporting event as unacceptable seems not only hypocritical but politically motivated. Cycling deserves leadership that applies its values consistently, without double standards or selective outrage.”
Read also
IDL-productions

Celia Gery won the European cyclocross championship while awaiting surgery: 'It'll be a new beginning'

Dutch team coach De Knegt annoyed by European Cyclocross Championships dispute: "A bit of a let down"

Glasgow set to shine as World Cup demand outstrips expectations and Mason eyes first home cyclocross race

Pogačar, Vingegaard and Van Aert went faster again in 2026... except when they didn't

Team GB dominate, China on the rise, Lavreysen the best ever? Five takeaways from the 2026 Track World Championships
Latest Cycling News

Eddie Dunbar wins Vuelta stage as Pinarello-Q36.5 put three riders in top five and Roglič attacks

Tom Pidcock ends 2026 fifth in the world, with Ciccone and Hayter arriving at Pinarello for 2027

Picnic PostNL's WorldTour uncertainty has five rival teams, and Tom Pidcock, watching the UCI closely

Ceylin del Carmen Alvarado's injury isn't as bad as feared, but she may not line up for a while

TotalEnergies rescued from collapse, but rider recruitment remains a problem before 27th Tour de France appearance
Popular Cycling News

Sven Nys spoke with Lucinda Brand straight after European Championship drama: 'Is that enough to ultimately relegate someone'

Fears of serious injury to Alvarado, bronze medalist, after the European Cyclocross Championships

Disqualified Schreiber skips European Championship podium: 'I’m very grateful that she said that'

Picnic PostNL's WorldTour uncertainty has five rival teams, and Tom Pidcock, watching the UCI closely

Schreiber slams disrespectful European cyclocross championship judges: 'They didn’t even let me finish speaking'
Latest Comments
- Eight riders told to go for stages, and nobody gets one—hard to know what the plan was there. It’ll be interesting to see whether they pick a clear leader next time.bikebuffj10-11-2026
- Was Bernal’s 20th place really their best GC result? I thought he might have finished higher. Either way, it sounds like a rough Tour for the whole team.gearguru3310-11-2026
- Five days in breaks with no stage win is a painful stat. The team had chances, but they need to turn those opportunities into results.julien10-11-2026
- The Onley Vuelta example makes sense: a team with someone to rally around often looks much more cohesive. Hopefully INEOS can build on that rather than expecting a quick return to the Sky years.cadencekingm10-11-2026
- Thomas is right about the ambiguity. Eight riders all chasing stages can end up pulling in different directions, even if nobody’s deliberately working against anyone. They need a clearer plan once the GC leaders are out.robert6510-11-2026
- What a mess. The report makes it sound as though nobody properly explained the decision, and that’s hard to defend.jennifer1910-11-2026
- I’m still learning the rules: does moving left in a sprint automatically bring a penalty, or does it depend on whether the other rider is blocked? It sounds like Brand wasn’t impeded here.patriciaw10-11-2026
- A final decision still needs a proper explanation. If the federation’s complaint goes nowhere, I hope the officials at least review how they handled the riders afterwards.michael5410-11-2026
- Fair play to Lucinda for saying Marie had won fair and square. That kind of sportsmanship matters, especially after such a controversial decision.raceready710-11-2026
- Schreiber beat Brand on the road, so the jury needed to explain clearly why that slight deviation warranted relegation. Being cut off before she could give her account sounds appalling.lindae10-11-2026


