Those looking to beat Pogacar need to hear this Skjelmose analysis: "It's a quality not to overthink everything"
Cycling
Follow IDL Pro Cycling on Google
Stay up to date with the best cycling news by making us a preferred source on Google.
Follow us on GoogleTadej Pogacar seemed unbeatable in 2025, but a few managed to do it anyway. Even in a tough classic such as the Amstel Gold Race, the Slovenian was eventually defeated, and that by none other than Mattias Skjelmose. In conversation with Wieler Revue, the Lidl-Trek Dane explains how he was at the base of "a blessing for the sport" in the Dutch hills.
ADVERTISEMENT
If you look among Pogacar's 2025 results, you will see lots of 1's and the occasional 2 or 3. In the spring it was quite often a 1, as he managed to win the UAE Tour, Strade Bianche and Tour of Flanders. After a second-place finish in Paris-Roubaix, the world champion focused on the Ardennes, where on April 13 in the Amstel Gold Race... he added a 2.
That was thanks to Skjelmose. The Dane went to the line together with Pogi and Remco Evenepoel and surprised almost everyone there by winning in the sprint. To get into that scenario, the climber from Copenhagen already had a lot to do. "When Alaphilippe attacked, I was somewhat blocked by Ben Healy," Skjelmose remembers.
Continue reading below the photo!

"It's a quality not to overthink everything"
"Afterwards, I missed the connection by five meters," the Lidl-Trek rider continued with his flashback. "That was partly because I decided not to ride myself over the top. In hindsight, that was the right tactic." The Dane won, but how well did he actually follow through on that 13th of April? "Obviously I had a very good day, but purely in terms of feeling I've had better days in 2025."
That good feeling caused Skjelmose to be in control, such as on the last ascent of the Cauberg. "I think Remco mainly rode tempo there and didn't necessarily try to drop us. We were all relying on our sprint." The Dane was therefore not nervou. "Why should I be? I just wanted to ride my best possible sprint and then I would finish first, second or third."
It all sounds very down-to-earth, and it actually is. "It's a quality of not overthinking everything," Skjelmose says aptly. "I was mostly concerned with what I had to do and didn't think about the size of the race and what a great opportunity it was for me to beat two of the best riders in the world."
Continue reading below the photo!

Skjelmose had difficult season
A little gambling was also something the rider from Copenhagen could do. "The gap with the chasers was big enough, which allowed me to play the game by not always pulling. I have no idea how many watts I kicked in the sprint, but I can say it wasn't very impressive. It had been such a tough course that we were all on the limit."
The seemingly unbeatable Pogacar was then beaten on "his" field after all, and that caused a lot of reactions. "That I won has given hope to other riders in the peloton. People came up to me and said it was a blessing for the sport," Skjelmose remembers.
Despite the fact that the Lidl-Trek Dane is looking back on a difficult season, in which he had to abandon in the Tour de France, the Amstel Gold Race really is on his palmares now. "It's nice that afterwards I can say, "No matter how difficult it was, but I did win the Amstel Gold Race." And that against Pogacar and Evenepoel. No one will ever be able to take that away from me again."
Read also
IDL-productions

Celia Gery won the European cyclocross championship while awaiting surgery: 'It'll be a new beginning'

Dutch team coach De Knegt annoyed by European Cyclocross Championships dispute: "A bit of a let down"

Glasgow set to shine as World Cup demand outstrips expectations and Mason eyes first home cyclocross race

Pogačar, Vingegaard and Van Aert went faster again in 2026... except when they didn't

Team GB dominate, China on the rise, Lavreysen the best ever? Five takeaways from the 2026 Track World Championships
Latest Cycling News

Eddie Dunbar wins Vuelta stage as Pinarello-Q36.5 put three riders in top five and Roglič attacks

Tom Pidcock ends 2026 fifth in the world, with Ciccone and Hayter arriving at Pinarello for 2027

Picnic PostNL's WorldTour uncertainty has five rival teams, and Tom Pidcock, watching the UCI closely

Ceylin del Carmen Alvarado's injury isn't as bad as feared, but she may not line up for a while

TotalEnergies rescued from collapse, but rider recruitment remains a problem before 27th Tour de France appearance
Popular Cycling News

Sven Nys spoke with Lucinda Brand straight after European Championship drama: 'Is that enough to ultimately relegate someone'

Fears of serious injury to Alvarado, bronze medalist, after the European Cyclocross Championships

Disqualified Schreiber skips European Championship podium: 'I’m very grateful that she said that'

Picnic PostNL's WorldTour uncertainty has five rival teams, and Tom Pidcock, watching the UCI closely

Eddie Dunbar wins Vuelta stage as Pinarello-Q36.5 put three riders in top five and Roglič attacks
Latest Comments
- Eight riders told to go for stages, and nobody gets one—hard to know what the plan was there. It’ll be interesting to see whether they pick a clear leader next time.bikebuffj10-11-2026
- Was Bernal’s 20th place really their best GC result? I thought he might have finished higher. Either way, it sounds like a rough Tour for the whole team.gearguru3310-11-2026
- Five days in breaks with no stage win is a painful stat. The team had chances, but they need to turn those opportunities into results.julien10-11-2026
- The Onley Vuelta example makes sense: a team with someone to rally around often looks much more cohesive. Hopefully INEOS can build on that rather than expecting a quick return to the Sky years.cadencekingm10-11-2026
- Thomas is right about the ambiguity. Eight riders all chasing stages can end up pulling in different directions, even if nobody’s deliberately working against anyone. They need a clearer plan once the GC leaders are out.robert6510-11-2026
- What a mess. The report makes it sound as though nobody properly explained the decision, and that’s hard to defend.jennifer1910-11-2026
- I’m still learning the rules: does moving left in a sprint automatically bring a penalty, or does it depend on whether the other rider is blocked? It sounds like Brand wasn’t impeded here.patriciaw10-11-2026
- A final decision still needs a proper explanation. If the federation’s complaint goes nowhere, I hope the officials at least review how they handled the riders afterwards.michael5410-11-2026
- Fair play to Lucinda for saying Marie had won fair and square. That kind of sportsmanship matters, especially after such a controversial decision.raceready710-11-2026
- Schreiber beat Brand on the road, so the jury needed to explain clearly why that slight deviation warranted relegation. Being cut off before she could give her account sounds appalling.lindae10-11-2026



