Former Lotto manager spills the beans: "We were going to unveil our co-sponsor on the Tour’s second rest day"
Cycling
Follow IDL Pro Cycling on Google
Stay up to date with the best cycling news by making us a preferred source on Google.
Follow us on GoogleIt is now almost November, and the upcoming merger between Lotto and Intermarché-Wanty has still not been officially finalized. Someone who exited the project earlier is French manager Stéphane Heulot. He resigned during the season and shares his thoughts on the situation with Cyclism'Actu.
ADVERTISEMENT
Heulot explains why he left Lotto in September and looks back on his time with the team. “I enjoyed these three years with my staff and my riders; I met some fantastic people. But the way the lottery, and in particular the Lotto team, functions and is managed is very complex and politicized.”
“Some people don't share my values. They are the ones who pay, so you have to accept the rules of the game,” says Heuot. “I was able to maneuver as I wanted for almost three years, but I had used up my energy and vision. It's an exhausting job,” the Frenchman says honestly.
“Being a manager means being constantly alert, listening, and often, you only hear about problems when the pressure is already high. I enjoy it, but you still need to have all the cards in your hand and be informed in time. That was not the case. I had maximized my capacity for acceptance. I feel that I have fulfilled my mission.”
Continue reading below the photo!

Heulot struggled to work with certain people
“I ended up in a team that had been disintegrated at all levels: financially, materially, and humanly,” he recalls. “There was no management left. It was a huge project. The team had just been transferred and had to be rebuilt. I discovered a board of directors, a lottery manager who interfered in everything...”
"If you read the press, you quickly understand that it's not easy to deal with certain personalities. But I put that aside. What mattered to me was my team, my staff, my riders, and the project's sustainability. And I think we succeeded in that. These three years have been great, both on a human and sporting level," Heulot reiterates to Cyclism'Actu.
Continue reading below the photo!

Heulot on merger between Lotto and Intermarché-Wanty
The impending merger with Intermarché-Wanty came as a shock to Heulot. "During the second week of the Tour, I was in Brittany to finalize talks with sponsors who wanted to join us. After the agreements were reached, I called a Board of Directors meeting to present the project. There, the director of the lottery told me that I was too late, that a merger with Intermarché was already underway. I fell off my chair," he recalls.
“We were going to announce the co-sponsor on the Monday of the second rest day of the Tour. Everything was ready. The sponsor became confused when he discovered a completely different strategy. From that moment on, everything was called into question,” says the Frenchman. “So I decided to quit. My departure took effect on September 30.”
"Between the Tour and that date, I only arranged the administrative transition, but without information about the merger and without wanting to. I kept in touch with several riders and staff members to help them on a human level, because they had been promised that their contracts would be respected, which was not always the case. My only wish today is that everything goes well for them," he says, addressing his former employees.
Read also
IDL-productions

Celia Gery won the European cyclocross championship while awaiting surgery: 'It'll be a new beginning'

Dutch team coach De Knegt annoyed by European Cyclocross Championships dispute: "A bit of a let down"

Glasgow set to shine as World Cup demand outstrips expectations and Mason eyes first home cyclocross race

Pogačar, Vingegaard and Van Aert went faster again in 2026... except when they didn't

Team GB dominate, China on the rise, Lavreysen the best ever? Five takeaways from the 2026 Track World Championships
Latest Cycling News

Eddie Dunbar wins Vuelta stage as Pinarello-Q36.5 put three riders in top five and Roglič attacks

Tom Pidcock ends 2026 fifth in the world, with Ciccone and Hayter arriving at Pinarello for 2027

Picnic PostNL's WorldTour uncertainty has five rival teams, and Tom Pidcock, watching the UCI closely

Ceylin del Carmen Alvarado's injury isn't as bad as feared, but she may not line up for a while

TotalEnergies rescued from collapse, but rider recruitment remains a problem before 27th Tour de France appearance
Popular Cycling News

Sven Nys spoke with Lucinda Brand straight after European Championship drama: 'Is that enough to ultimately relegate someone'

Fears of serious injury to Alvarado, bronze medalist, after the European Cyclocross Championships

Disqualified Schreiber skips European Championship podium: 'I’m very grateful that she said that'

Picnic PostNL's WorldTour uncertainty has five rival teams, and Tom Pidcock, watching the UCI closely

Schreiber slams disrespectful European cyclocross championship judges: 'They didn’t even let me finish speaking'
Latest Comments
- Eight riders told to go for stages, and nobody gets one—hard to know what the plan was there. It’ll be interesting to see whether they pick a clear leader next time.bikebuffj10-11-2026
- Was Bernal’s 20th place really their best GC result? I thought he might have finished higher. Either way, it sounds like a rough Tour for the whole team.gearguru3310-11-2026
- Five days in breaks with no stage win is a painful stat. The team had chances, but they need to turn those opportunities into results.julien10-11-2026
- The Onley Vuelta example makes sense: a team with someone to rally around often looks much more cohesive. Hopefully INEOS can build on that rather than expecting a quick return to the Sky years.cadencekingm10-11-2026
- Thomas is right about the ambiguity. Eight riders all chasing stages can end up pulling in different directions, even if nobody’s deliberately working against anyone. They need a clearer plan once the GC leaders are out.robert6510-11-2026
- What a mess. The report makes it sound as though nobody properly explained the decision, and that’s hard to defend.jennifer1910-11-2026
- I’m still learning the rules: does moving left in a sprint automatically bring a penalty, or does it depend on whether the other rider is blocked? It sounds like Brand wasn’t impeded here.patriciaw10-11-2026
- A final decision still needs a proper explanation. If the federation’s complaint goes nowhere, I hope the officials at least review how they handled the riders afterwards.michael5410-11-2026
- Fair play to Lucinda for saying Marie had won fair and square. That kind of sportsmanship matters, especially after such a controversial decision.raceready710-11-2026
- Schreiber beat Brand on the road, so the jury needed to explain clearly why that slight deviation warranted relegation. Being cut off before she could give her account sounds appalling.lindae10-11-2026


