
Follow IDL Pro Cycling on Google
Stay up to date with the best cycling news by making us a preferred source on Google.
Follow us on GoogleThere has been a lot of talk in recent weeks about the UCI and the way it applies and enforces its regulations. There was the case involving Lorena Wiebes at the Giro d’Italia Women, Jan-Willem van Schip was removed from a race once again, and several teams at the Tour Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes were handed heavy fines.
ADVERTISEMENT
Patrick Lefevere has devoted his weekly column
in Het Nieuwsblad to that run of incidents. In typical Lefevere style, he began with a pointed question: “Something I asked myself this week: what does the UCI do with its pot of fine money? Who manages all that cash? Does it flow back into cycling, or do they go out for a good meal in Aigle with it? Investing in Swiss real estate is another option, because the sums really are no longer normal.”
“I can imagine that a team like UAE Team Emirates might shrug off such an amount, but for the ‘smaller teams’ it hurts,” the Belgian continued. “The individual riders or sports directors receive the fines, but the teams pay them. That was the case ‘in my time’ at Soudal-Quick Step and I assume it is the same elsewhere. Paying UCI fines for a whole year weighs on a budget. The Swiss franc has not exactly become weaker in recent years either.”
According to Lefevere, the UCI’s message over the past few weeks has been impossible to miss. “Big Brother is watching you. Lorena Wiebes’ bike twenty grams too heavy? Out of the race. Jan-Willem van Schip has a strange stem, a strange position on the bike or a strange look in his eyes? Out of the race. Even if the gendarmerie has to box him in. And for everything else: fines, fines, fines,” he wrote.
Read also
Read more below the photo.

Lorena Wiebes was disqualified from the Giro because her bike was too light.
Lefevere on AIGCP president Copeland
Lefevere himself was chairman of the AIGCP, the association representing professional cycling teams, for some time. “During my AIGCP years, I was often the whipping boy, but nobody could accuse me of not standing on the barricades. And that is exactly what I miss now. Brent Copeland really wanted to be AIGCP president and was the first to criticise all his predecessors, but what has he actually changed for the better? When do you hear from him?”
“We have had one safety issue after another this year: barriers with feet, corners fifty metres from the finish line. And then I read an interview with Copeland on Cyclingnews with the headline ‘Safety is everyone’s responsibility.’ Even CD&V no longer uses such empty phrases. The message the teams should be sending is: ‘we will not accept this.’ SafeR started with the teams, but in the meantime ASO and the UCI have completely pulled it towards themselves.”
Lefevere closed his column in Het Nieuwsblad with one final jab. “I absolutely do not want to return to the AIGCP, but even if I say so myself: the teams could really use someone with my tact — or rather, my lack of it.”
Author: David
Bavin-Hobbs - [email protected]
Read also

David Bavin-HobbsChief Editor
David has been working in the sports & cycling industry for 16 years. Covering racing, business and technology, he has worked in communications for cycling companies, teams, and as a journalist. His proudest achievement is winning the first bike race he ever entered. He hasn't won a race since.
IDL-productions

Celia Gery won the European cyclocross championship while awaiting surgery: 'It'll be a new beginning'

Dutch team coach De Knegt annoyed by European Cyclocross Championships dispute: "A bit of a let down"

Glasgow set to shine as World Cup demand outstrips expectations and Mason eyes first home cyclocross race

Pogačar, Vingegaard and Van Aert went faster again in 2026... except when they didn't

Team GB dominate, China on the rise, Lavreysen the best ever? Five takeaways from the 2026 Track World Championships
Latest Cycling News

Eddie Dunbar wins Vuelta stage as Pinarello-Q36.5 put three riders in top five and Roglič attacks

Tom Pidcock ends 2026 fifth in the world, with Ciccone and Hayter arriving at Pinarello for 2027

Picnic PostNL's WorldTour uncertainty has five rival teams, and Tom Pidcock, watching the UCI closely

Ceylin del Carmen Alvarado's injury isn't as bad as feared, but she may not line up for a while

TotalEnergies rescued from collapse, but rider recruitment remains a problem before 27th Tour de France appearance
Popular Cycling News

Sven Nys spoke with Lucinda Brand straight after European Championship drama: 'Is that enough to ultimately relegate someone'

Fears of serious injury to Alvarado, bronze medalist, after the European Cyclocross Championships

Disqualified Schreiber skips European Championship podium: 'I’m very grateful that she said that'

Picnic PostNL's WorldTour uncertainty has five rival teams, and Tom Pidcock, watching the UCI closely

Eddie Dunbar wins Vuelta stage as Pinarello-Q36.5 put three riders in top five and Roglič attacks
Latest Comments
- Eight riders told to go for stages, and nobody gets one—hard to know what the plan was there. It’ll be interesting to see whether they pick a clear leader next time.bikebuffj10-11-2026
- Was Bernal’s 20th place really their best GC result? I thought he might have finished higher. Either way, it sounds like a rough Tour for the whole team.gearguru3310-11-2026
- Five days in breaks with no stage win is a painful stat. The team had chances, but they need to turn those opportunities into results.julien10-11-2026
- The Onley Vuelta example makes sense: a team with someone to rally around often looks much more cohesive. Hopefully INEOS can build on that rather than expecting a quick return to the Sky years.cadencekingm10-11-2026
- Thomas is right about the ambiguity. Eight riders all chasing stages can end up pulling in different directions, even if nobody’s deliberately working against anyone. They need a clearer plan once the GC leaders are out.robert6510-11-2026
- What a mess. The report makes it sound as though nobody properly explained the decision, and that’s hard to defend.jennifer1910-11-2026
- I’m still learning the rules: does moving left in a sprint automatically bring a penalty, or does it depend on whether the other rider is blocked? It sounds like Brand wasn’t impeded here.patriciaw10-11-2026
- A final decision still needs a proper explanation. If the federation’s complaint goes nowhere, I hope the officials at least review how they handled the riders afterwards.michael5410-11-2026
- Fair play to Lucinda for saying Marie had won fair and square. That kind of sportsmanship matters, especially after such a controversial decision.raceready710-11-2026
- Schreiber beat Brand on the road, so the jury needed to explain clearly why that slight deviation warranted relegation. Being cut off before she could give her account sounds appalling.lindae10-11-2026


