
Follow IDL Pro Cycling on Google
Stay up to date with the best cycling news by making us a preferred source on Google.
Follow us on GoogleThe Star of Bessèges was arguably the most chaotic stage race of 2025. Several times during the French race, vehicles ended up on the road, which ultimately led to eight of the 21 teams withdrawing. The UCI 2.1 event remains on the calendar, but with far fewer big names on the start line — despite promises that safety would be improved.
ADVERTISEMENT
The defining story of last year’s edition was the chaos during the opening stages. Maxim Van Gils crashed, and less than a day later another vehicle appeared on the course. Those incidents prompted almost all of the major teams to pull out. Teams such as Lidl-Trek, INEOS Grenadiers and Soudal Quick-Step will not be lining up in France this time.
Last year, riders like Mads Pedersen, Kévin Vauquelin, Filippo Ganna, Paul Magnier and Arnaud De Lie were on the start list at the Star of Bessèges. After the chaos of 2025, the organisers will have to make do this year with standout names like Paul Lapeira and Dylan Groenewegen — a notable difference compared to 2025.
Read on below the video!
Extra safety measures in 2026
Following the disastrous 2025 edition, the organisers have sat down and introduced additional safety measures. Roads will be closed 20 minutes in advance instead of the previous 10, dozens of motorbikes will be sent up the road to warn of hazards, and gendarmerie motorbikes will be assigned exclusively to the peloton zone.
With these changes, the organisation hopes to limit the damage this year — with mixed success. The positive is that the race stays on the calendar and can still count on support from (mainly French) WorldTour and ProTeam squads.
However, there are still six fewer WorldTour teams on the start list compared to last year — and that is largely down to what happened in 2025. Jürgen Foré, CEO of the absent Soudal Quick-Step, admitted to Het Nieuwsblad that memories of last year’s edition certainly played a role in the decision not to start this year.
Continue reading below the photo!

Organisers still unhappy about withdrawing teams in 2025
That some teams who withdrew last year are not returning this year is not a huge problem for former rider and Star of Bessèges security director Romain Leroux. “If teams like Decathlon CMA CGM or Lidl-Trek wanted to race here this year, I could have accepted that, because they’ve been coming for years. But teams like Bora and Soudal, who only raced last year and made fools of us, I wouldn’t have needed here,” Leroux said firmly.
The organisation has also rewarded the teams that did continue in 2025. All teams that finished last year’s chaotic edition were invited first, and only then were the remaining WorldTour teams approached. Fortunately for the organisers, four top-tier teams will still start.
Another boost for the race: positive messages from within the peloton. Both Marc Madiot (Groupama-FDJ boss) and Laurent Pichon (sporting director at Pinarello–Q36.5 Pro Cycling) told L’Équipe they have “enormous appreciation for the organisation” and stressed how important small French races like this are.
The UCI 2.1 stage race, which begins on Wednesday 4 February with a flat stage featuring a rising final kilometre, will now have to prove that these measures are enough — and that it can slowly rebuild trust among the biggest teams in the years ahead.
Read also
PD
Pim van der Doelen
IDL-productions

Celia Gery won the European cyclocross championship while awaiting surgery: 'It'll be a new beginning'

Dutch team coach De Knegt annoyed by European Cyclocross Championships dispute: "A bit of a let down"

Glasgow set to shine as World Cup demand outstrips expectations and Mason eyes first home cyclocross race

Pogačar, Vingegaard and Van Aert went faster again in 2026... except when they didn't

Team GB dominate, China on the rise, Lavreysen the best ever? Five takeaways from the 2026 Track World Championships
Latest Cycling News

Eddie Dunbar wins Vuelta stage as Pinarello-Q36.5 put three riders in top five and Roglič attacks

Tom Pidcock ends 2026 fifth in the world, with Ciccone and Hayter arriving at Pinarello for 2027

Picnic PostNL's WorldTour uncertainty has five rival teams, and Tom Pidcock, watching the UCI closely

Ceylin del Carmen Alvarado's injury isn't as bad as feared, but she may not line up for a while

TotalEnergies rescued from collapse, but rider recruitment remains a problem before 27th Tour de France appearance
Popular Cycling News

Sven Nys spoke with Lucinda Brand straight after European Championship drama: 'Is that enough to ultimately relegate someone'

Fears of serious injury to Alvarado, bronze medalist, after the European Cyclocross Championships

Disqualified Schreiber skips European Championship podium: 'I’m very grateful that she said that'

Picnic PostNL's WorldTour uncertainty has five rival teams, and Tom Pidcock, watching the UCI closely

Schreiber slams disrespectful European cyclocross championship judges: 'They didn’t even let me finish speaking'
Latest Comments
- Eight riders told to go for stages, and nobody gets one—hard to know what the plan was there. It’ll be interesting to see whether they pick a clear leader next time.bikebuffj10-11-2026
- Was Bernal’s 20th place really their best GC result? I thought he might have finished higher. Either way, it sounds like a rough Tour for the whole team.gearguru3310-11-2026
- Five days in breaks with no stage win is a painful stat. The team had chances, but they need to turn those opportunities into results.julien10-11-2026
- The Onley Vuelta example makes sense: a team with someone to rally around often looks much more cohesive. Hopefully INEOS can build on that rather than expecting a quick return to the Sky years.cadencekingm10-11-2026
- Thomas is right about the ambiguity. Eight riders all chasing stages can end up pulling in different directions, even if nobody’s deliberately working against anyone. They need a clearer plan once the GC leaders are out.robert6510-11-2026
- What a mess. The report makes it sound as though nobody properly explained the decision, and that’s hard to defend.jennifer1910-11-2026
- I’m still learning the rules: does moving left in a sprint automatically bring a penalty, or does it depend on whether the other rider is blocked? It sounds like Brand wasn’t impeded here.patriciaw10-11-2026
- A final decision still needs a proper explanation. If the federation’s complaint goes nowhere, I hope the officials at least review how they handled the riders afterwards.michael5410-11-2026
- Fair play to Lucinda for saying Marie had won fair and square. That kind of sportsmanship matters, especially after such a controversial decision.raceready710-11-2026
- Schreiber beat Brand on the road, so the jury needed to explain clearly why that slight deviation warranted relegation. Being cut off before she could give her account sounds appalling.lindae10-11-2026

